Property & Tenancy
Service Charges and What a Leaseholder Is Actually Paying For
A recurring bill for a building you partly own raises an obvious question. The answer lies in the lease, and the lease is usually less generous than assumed.

The points below about recurring charges for the upkeep of shared property are ordered by how much difference they make, not by how often they get repeated.
What matters most
- The lease defines what may be charged and how it is apportioned.
- Many systems require charges to be reasonable and properly consulted upon.
- Reserve funds spread large future costs across several years.
The lease sets the boundaries
A service charge is a contractual mechanism, and the lease determines what costs may be recovered and from whom. If a category of expenditure is not covered by the lease, the landlord generally cannot recover it however sensible the spending was. Conversely, a widely drafted clause may permit recovery of costs that leaseholders never anticipated when they bought.
Apportionment is also set by the lease, and it may be by floor area, by unit count or by a fixed percentage. Those percentages sometimes fail to add to the whole, which produces a shortfall that has to be resolved somehow.
What tends to be included
Typical categories include insurance of the structure, maintenance of common parts, cleaning, lighting and the management fee. Major works such as roof replacement or external redecoration produce the largest and most contested demands.
For most everyday situations, costs relating to a leaseholder's own unit are usually their own responsibility rather than a shared charge. The boundary between structure and interior is defined by the lease and is a frequent source of argument. Where that boundary sits also determines who insures what, which matters enormously when damage occurs.
Reasonableness and its limits
Many systems require service charges to be reasonably incurred and the resulting work to be of a reasonable standard. That requirement is not a right to the cheapest option, and a landlord may generally choose a competent contractor over the lowest bid. Challenges usually succeed where costs are disproportionate, where work was unnecessary or where the lease did not permit recovery.
In the wording, the forum for such challenges differs, with some jurisdictions providing specialist tribunals and others leaving it to general courts. Time limits for challenging a charge exist in many systems and can be short, which catches leaseholders who negotiate first.
Consultation before major works
Several jurisdictions require a formal consultation process before large works or long-term contracts are charged to leaseholders. The process typically involves notice, an opportunity to comment and, sometimes, an opportunity to nominate contractors.
Failure to consult can restrict what is recoverable, which is why managing agents treat the procedure carefully. The thresholds triggering consultation, and the consequences of failure, are set locally and change over time. No general description of such a process should be taken as stating the requirements in any particular place.
Reserve funds and the smoothing problem
Reserve or sinking funds collect money in advance so that large periodic costs do not arrive as a single demand. Where the lease permits such a fund, contributions are usually held for the building rather than returned on sale. A building without a reserve fund tends to produce sudden and substantial bills when major works become unavoidable.
For most everyday situations, buyers frequently overlook the state of the reserve fund, which is a significant part of what they are acquiring. How such funds must be held and accounted for is regulated in some jurisdictions and unregulated in others.
Limitation periods are short and unforgiving, which is why proper advice is worth taking early rather than after reading around.
Transparency and disputes
Leaseholders in many systems have rights to see accounts, invoices and supporting documents for charges demanded. Exercising those rights early tends to resolve more disputes than withholding payment, which can itself carry consequences. Withholding service charges may breach the lease and, in some systems, put the leasehold interest at risk.
Where a dispute goes formal, collective action among leaseholders is common because the costs of challenge are more proportionate when shared. Anybody considering a formal challenge should take advice from a qualified lawyer familiar with the local leasehold regime.
Everything above, in order of what to do first
- The lease sets the boundaries. A service charge is a contractual mechanism, and the lease determines what costs may be recovered and from whom.
- What tends to be included. Typical categories include insurance of the structure, maintenance of common parts, cleaning, lighting and the management fee.
- Reasonableness and its limits. Many systems require service charges to be reasonably incurred and the resulting work to be of a reasonable standard.
- Consultation before major works. Several jurisdictions require a formal consultation process before large works or long-term contracts are charged to leaseholders.
- Reserve funds and the smoothing problem. Reserve or sinking funds collect money in advance so that large periodic costs do not arrive as a single demand.
- Transparency and disputes. Leaseholders in many systems have rights to see accounts, invoices and supporting documents for charges demanded.
The takeaway
The lease, not the invoice, decides what you can be asked to pay. This is general information, not legal advice.
Most disputes are settled by whoever kept the better record.
Questions readers ask
Can I refuse to pay a service charge I think is excessive?
Withholding payment can breach the lease and create serious consequences, even where the challenge has merit. Most systems provide a separate route for disputing charges.
Do I get my reserve fund contributions back when I sell?
Usually not, because contributions generally belong to the fund for the building rather than to the individual. The lease determines the position.
Also by Meenakshi Raghavan
- Void, Voidable and Unenforceable Are Not Three Words for the Same ThingContracts & Agreements
- Why Courts Treat a Penalty Differently From a Genuine Estimate of LossContracts & Agreements
- What You Actually Own When You Buy a DownloadConsumer Rights
- Why a Fault That Appears Later Is Argued DifferentlyConsumer Rights





