Family Matters
Deputyship: When Nobody Held Authority in Advance
If a person loses capacity without having appointed an attorney, authority to act on their behalf must be granted by a court, which is slower and more supervised.

Arrangements made in advance allow a chosen person to act if capacity is lost. Where nothing was arranged, someone must apply to a court instead.
The gap that appears without prior appointment
Family members have no automatic authority over an adult's finances or affairs in most systems. Banks, landlords and service providers cannot lawfully take instructions from them.
This surprises relatives who assume that being next of kin confers authority. Next of kin is largely a hospital contact convention rather than a legal power.
The result is practical paralysis: bills unpaid, property unmanaged and decisions unmade. The court route exists to resolve exactly that.
What a court-appointed representative is
Different systems use different names, but the concept is a person authorised by a court to make specified decisions for someone lacking capacity. The authority is defined by the order rather than assumed.
Orders commonly separate property and financial decisions from decisions about personal welfare. The second category is granted more sparingly in many systems.
Why it is slower and more supervised
Because the person concerned did not choose the appointee, the court substitutes scrutiny for consent. Applications involve evidence of incapacity, notification of relatives and assessment of suitability.
Ongoing supervision usually follows, often including annual accounts and sometimes security arrangements. Fees and reporting requirements attach for the duration.
All of this is why advance appointment is generally cheaper and faster. The supervision replaces the trust the person would have placed in a chosen attorney.
Duties owed to the person, not the family
An appointee must act in the interests of the person concerned, following whatever framework local law prescribes. Their own convenience and the wider family's preferences are not the test.
Decisions typically must take account of the person's past and present wishes so far as they can be ascertained. Capacity is usually assessed decision by decision rather than as a global status.
Limits on what can be authorised
Some acts are usually outside an appointee's authority without specific permission, such as making substantial gifts or a will on the person's behalf. Those require separate applications.
Selling a home or making significant investments may also need express authority. Because the categories, the terminology and the supervision regime differ substantially between jurisdictions, families facing this should take advice from a lawyer experienced in the local system, and consider advance appointments while capacity remains.
Questions readers ask
Is an advance decision binding on doctors?
In some systems a valid advance refusal of specific treatment can bind, while requests for treatment are treated differently. Recognition and requirements vary considerably between countries.
Does such a document work abroad?
Not reliably, since recognition depends on the law where treatment is given. People spending significant time in more than one country often take advice in each.
Also by Meenakshi Raghavan
- Void, Voidable and Unenforceable Are Not Three Words for the Same ThingContracts & Agreements
- Why Courts Treat a Penalty Differently From a Genuine Estimate of LossContracts & Agreements
- What You Actually Own When You Buy a DownloadConsumer Rights
- Why a Fault That Appears Later Is Argued DifferentlyConsumer Rights





