Legal Way EasyPlain words for everyday law

Contracts & AgreementsConsumer RightsProperty & TenancyWork & Employment

Family Matters

Deputyship: When Nobody Held Authority in Advance

If a person loses capacity without having appointed an attorney, authority to act on their behalf must be granted by a court, which is slower and more supervised.

A close-up shot of the Book of Revelation from the Bible, emphasizing text.
Photograph by Brett Jordan via Pexels
General information, not legal advice. This explains how something generally works. Law differs by jurisdiction and turns on the facts of a particular case, so it cannot tell you what to do about yours — take advice from a qualified lawyer before acting. How we work.

Arrangements made in advance allow a chosen person to act if capacity is lost. Where nothing was arranged, someone must apply to a court instead.

The gap that appears without prior appointment

Family members have no automatic authority over an adult's finances or affairs in most systems. Banks, landlords and service providers cannot lawfully take instructions from them.

This surprises relatives who assume that being next of kin confers authority. Next of kin is largely a hospital contact convention rather than a legal power.

The result is practical paralysis: bills unpaid, property unmanaged and decisions unmade. The court route exists to resolve exactly that.

What a court-appointed representative is

Different systems use different names, but the concept is a person authorised by a court to make specified decisions for someone lacking capacity. The authority is defined by the order rather than assumed.

Orders commonly separate property and financial decisions from decisions about personal welfare. The second category is granted more sparingly in many systems.

Why it is slower and more supervised

Because the person concerned did not choose the appointee, the court substitutes scrutiny for consent. Applications involve evidence of incapacity, notification of relatives and assessment of suitability.

Ongoing supervision usually follows, often including annual accounts and sometimes security arrangements. Fees and reporting requirements attach for the duration.

All of this is why advance appointment is generally cheaper and faster. The supervision replaces the trust the person would have placed in a chosen attorney.

Duties owed to the person, not the family

An appointee must act in the interests of the person concerned, following whatever framework local law prescribes. Their own convenience and the wider family's preferences are not the test.

Decisions typically must take account of the person's past and present wishes so far as they can be ascertained. Capacity is usually assessed decision by decision rather than as a global status.

Limits on what can be authorised

Some acts are usually outside an appointee's authority without specific permission, such as making substantial gifts or a will on the person's behalf. Those require separate applications.

Selling a home or making significant investments may also need express authority. Because the categories, the terminology and the supervision regime differ substantially between jurisdictions, families facing this should take advice from a lawyer experienced in the local system, and consider advance appointments while capacity remains.

Questions readers ask

Is an advance decision binding on doctors?

In some systems a valid advance refusal of specific treatment can bind, while requests for treatment are treated differently. Recognition and requirements vary considerably between countries.

Does such a document work abroad?

Not reliably, since recognition depends on the law where treatment is given. People spending significant time in more than one country often take advice in each.

Family Mattersadvance decisionshealthcare planningcapacity
More in Family Matters
Meenakshi Raghavan
Editor, Legal Way Easy

Meenakshi edits Legal Way Easy and cuts any sentence that reads like advice.

Also by Meenakshi Raghavan